![]() But things have matured since and I haven't heard of any problems for a while now (as in specific problem with a specific brand, you still hear people repeating ominous warnings but without pointing to anything specific and concrete). For me going to a Samsung SSD was the solution then.Ī few years later two Samsung SSD generations (I think the 830 and 840) had some problems that took several firmware updates to get fixed. ![]() ![]() I can personally attest to an issue with Crucial SSDs in a 2009 MBP which was more of a SATA issue of the MBP (these were some of the first MBPs using SATA for the optical drive, a couple of MBP models were affected and results could vary from copy to copy). Most of the reviews I read were from people with 2009, 2010 etc MacBooks, but I didn't see any negatives for people with 2012 Macbook pro's. I would always prefer Crucial over Samsung SSDs, because if you do some research, you will find many disappointed Samsung customers. Is Crucial still a "good" brand for my 2012? It's a bit cheaper than Samsung.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |